Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Lights Fucked on the Hairy Amp Drooling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep Tito xd (?!?) 00:38, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

All Lights Fucked on the Hairy Amp Drooling
NN, D. ComCat 01:03, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Forgot to list this, added it today. ComCat 01:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. First release by notable band. TheMadBaron 02:32, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Agree with MadBaron. Notable.  Check out the listing for "Godspeed You Black Emperor!" at allmusic.com. Sunray 02:48, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Categorizable, notable album. If this single entry was non-existent within the Godspeed You Black Emperor albums section, someone would create it. The fight to delete this article would never be over. Bobo192 03:00, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable if the band is notable, and they sure look notable according to WP:MUSIC. -- SCZenz 03:04, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as first release by notable artist. Capitalistroadster 04:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep passes the bare minimums for Wikiproject Albums.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 11:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Not to be contrarian, but what on earth is worth keeping here? A list of sales and tracks?  Put the info in the band's article and delete this.  33 copies sold and yet it is so worthy of an encyclopedic article that it cannot subsist within the main article?  That's ridiculous! Dottore So 11:11, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The problem is you see it as it is now... not how it could be in a mere few hours of research and editing. Merging back into the band's article would just require it to be spun off yet again when more content was added. All of this bands other albums have very decent articles, just give it a bit of time i'm sure this one will eventually as well.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 11:43, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster. I have no problem with listing early albums of bands that have achieved notability (and GSYBE is certainly notable), even if they were not notable at the time of release.--Isotope23 15:11, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable. Amren (talk) 13:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep and can an admin please close this now it has been more than five days already Yuckfoo 22:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually yuck... tommorrow is 5 days (12 Oct) ... since this was not properly listed til the 7th.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 22:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename To something shorter and less offensive. - Bwfc 16:39, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Did you even bother to LOOK at the article in question? Its the name of an album, you cant make it shorter and less offensive, wikipedia is not bawdlerized(sp?).  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 21:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually i did! It Could Be Named All Lights (Album). - Bwfc 21:41, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.