Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Party Parliamentary Group for Learning & Skills in the Criminal Justice System


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 19:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

All Party Parliamentary Group for Learning & Skills in the Criminal Justice System
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Short-lived and non-notable All-Party Parliamentary Group. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems notable. Everyking (talk) 07:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * As established by which sources? Cordless Larry (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I'm not finding any sourcing, and even the article doesn't claim that they actually did anything in the few months they existed. I do note that the All Party Penal Affairs Group might be a better article subject. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't know if there are any established standards for notability for All Party Parliamentary Groups but there are hundreds of them and few have really good sourcing. Despite a sliver of official recognition they are not truly accountable to anybody and have no established method of reporting their activities. Some have been going for a long time and are respected, eg the America All Party Parliamentary Group. But in general they would have a high threshold to cross and this particular one comes nowhere near it. Sam Blacketer (talk) 23:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing inherently notable about All Party Parliamentary Groups; many are pretty inactive, and according to the article, this one only lasted a year. Warofdreams talk 00:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.