Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Saints' CE Whetstone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of schools in the London Borough of Barnet. At present, I feel that the calls to merge the content with that article is a rather tall order, since I cannot find any natural way of doing so without unbalancing that article. Much of the article content is about teachers and employee business, and whether that is mergeable is debatable. I'm not deleting the history, so if anyone finds an adequate way of merging anything in the future, they will have access to the material. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

All Saints&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nn primary school, unsourced claim to be the 4th best at something doesn't make it notable either - the article is in dreadful condition and is not encyclopedic in tone or content - if this school becomes notable, it's probably better to start from scratch anyway rather than having this start about which teacher is caring and which one didn't succeed at her prior job. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 04:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 04:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge (not just a redirect) to List of schools in the London Borough of Barnet, a page badly needing some prosed content. In 2002 the school was in the top 5% nationally in English and in 2003 in English and Science - see here. However, its overall performance isn't good enough to make it sufficiently notable for its own page. Having said that, there is plenty there about the specific performances to justify a section in the omnibus article. TerriersFan (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per TerriersFan.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 02:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Camaron | Chris (talk) 13:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.