Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Saints, Poplar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

All Saints, Poplar
Barely a sub-stub about another British church. Gets 55 Google hits.  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 21:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom weak delete almost notable??? --Nick Y. 21:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I must be missing something. What is almost notable about it?  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 01:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep This is a stub, but we should hope that some one will be able to expand it. Peterkingiron 23:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable at all. SushiGeek 01:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Church dates from the 1820s and has a history that can be told (per rapid google check). Alternative would be to merge with Charles Hollis. -- JJay 20:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I've no objection to articles on individual churches but they should have some content. This one appears to have been abandoned by its originator some months ago and not taken up by anyone else.
 * Weak Delete. A British Church that only dates from the 1820s is not notable.  An American church dating from that time might be.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 18:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. - Rudykog 23:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.