Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All The Ordinary Angels (Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

All The Ordinary Angels (Film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The play seemed to get some attention, but the film seems very indie with little media coverage. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete The article has no reliable sources. Searching turned up nothing helpful. Fails WP:NFILM. Gab4gab (talk) 16:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment It was basically a student film, made at the British Youth Film Academy, and doesn't seem to have been released or received any coverage. The play is sort of notable, so it could be moved to All The Ordinary Angels (which would be the correct title even if it is kept). --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment User:Colapeninsula WikiDan61 Any assistance in doing this change would be greatly apprieciated and i'll be happy to make such changes if concensus is reached on deletion of the film/ if you beleive the play is notable enough. Thank you all for your help. Film9 (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I have nominated Nicholas Connor (Film Director) and am co-nominating all of his films. This film will also be listed at that discussion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Struck comment. This is not a film directed by Connor -- he only served as Script Supervisor on the film. I still don't think the article meets WP:NF as there does not appear to be any significant coverage available. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.