Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All in a Row


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

All in a Row

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The game is non-notable and effectively unsourced. It is not listed in major sources like Parlett (1979) or Morehead and Mott-Smith (2001) or the more recent Parodi (2004) and Arnold (2011). The one reference supplied is a dead link. The article has been written by Shlomi Fish (User:Shlomif) whose software solver programme takes up the biggest section of the article; this may be in contravention of WP:NOTADVOCACY. Bermicourt (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The cited refs do not support stand-alone notability, and the nom's BEFORE seems reasonable. Ping me if better sources are found. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.