Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Jenkins

The entire last paragraph is not neutral point of view and needs to be rewritten. --Kelly Martin 13:00, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Vfd
On 27 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Votes for deletion/Allan Jenkins for a record of the discussion. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 02:01, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

Complaint

 * User_talk:Sam_Spade

¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 13:30, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Clearly Allan Jenkins is editor of Observer Magazine, but is there any source for any of the other information? Fred Bauder 00:07, July 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * "My name is allan jenkins, editor of the Observer magazine in London, it has been brought to my attention that there is inaccurate information about me appearing on your website (also that there was some extremely libellous stuff there which has been deleted but can still be read on expand.


 * Points: "Libellous" is dubious, but removal of unsourced allegations is appropriate. Deletion of limited, unsourced page history isnt really controversial. "Less than keen on naming" is very dubious. -SV|t 01:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)


 * I'd certainly have been loathe to remove it solely on the grounds of "less than keen on naming" (because it's presumably a matter of public record one way or another), but there's not much reason to add it back in regardless - a significant number of our biographical articles (at least for men) don't even manage to mention if they were married, much less anything about their wives... Shimgray 02:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)