Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allanah Starr's Big Boob Adventures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A redirect, if desired, can be created WP:BOLDly. The Bushranger One ping only 01:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Allanah Starr's Big Boob Adventures

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 19:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 19:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Non notable porn film. Fails to meet the criteria of Notability (films). Pichpich (talk) 17:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: although I've done some work to the article, it still doesn't meet WP:NF or WP:PORNBIO. Thine   Antique   Pen  19:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only basis for maintaining this article that I can see (using Notability (films) would be its nomination for an award and, if that were the sole basis for maintaining an article about one of the performers in the film, it would unambiguously fail WP:PORNBIO and WP:NF; there has to be something more that lends notability to this film and I don't see anything.  (I can't recommend that this be turned into a redirect to Allanah Starr because the article's creator seems to think that this eponymous film stars Buck Angel over Mx. Starr, which is baffling but I've never seen the film and cannot say.) Ubelowme U  Me  20:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NF --Artene50 (talk) 02:55, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 04:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not the subject of multiple independently published pieces of coverage in so-called "reliable sources," fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * DELETE stub article for lacking independent notability under WP:NF, and REDIRECT title to director Gia Darling where it can be mentioned in context as one of the director's works.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:55, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * One problem is that there are three possible redirect targets: the director (which would be the obvious choice if this wasn't porn), the star actor (which would seem like a better choice considering it's porn) or the star writer and probably producer who gave his/her name to the film (does that trump everything?). Frankly, if the film isn't notable, I'd rather have no redirect in this case. Pichpich (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What I was trying to do here was ignore the film being "porn" and instead treat it as I might any other searcable topic by sending readers to a place where it might be spoken of in context. While a producer may be responsible for financing, a writer responsible for scripting, and porn stars responsible for (ahem) performing, I determined the director as being the person majorly responsible for what eventualy made it to the screen... and the thing did receive genre recognition through a genre award.  We have enough to allow a mention or listing in the director's article... and such a mention does not require independent notability for a film, but simply verfiability of why it merited contextual inclusion elsewhere.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete without redirect. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a host for catalogs of non-notable porn videos. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No one in this discussion, myself included, is suggesting we "host" a catalog of non-notable films. However, it is appropriate to mention a filmmaker's work within an article on the filmmaker. A redirect sends anyone looking for such a film (even if not me or you), to someplace where such are given context.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.