Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of homosexual abuse by Sathya Sai Baba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. Completely inappropriate title deleted as attack. لenna vecia  18:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Allegations of homosexual abuse by Sathya Sai Baba

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy deletion rationale by tagger was: "This is redundant file. The same exact copy can be found in the Sathya Sai Baba Main article under the section - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sathya_Sai_Baba#Reports_of_sexual_abuse. This subsection was initially created due to WP:POV fork. It is really being difficult to maintain 2 copies of the same article." Agreed. - Dank (push to talk) 03:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 04:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Here are the reasons why I would recommend deleting this article:
 * This article has exactly a mirror copy in the main Sathya Sai Baba article section - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sathya_Sai_Baba#Reports_of_sexual_abuse.
 * Its becoming increasingly difficult to maintain 2 copies.
 * This subarticle was created initially by User:White_Adept - for WP:POV fork. He created it inspite of other editors telling him not to create this sub-article.
 * Similar sub-article titled "Allegations against Sathya Sai Baba" was asked to be deleted in 2006 and to maintain it under the main Sathya Sai Baba article during the BostonMA mediation discussion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BostonMA/Mediation. Reason for this proposal was mainly not to allow WP:POV fork and maintenance issues in the sub-article. Radiantenergy (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —SpacemanSpiff (talk) 06:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This content clearly belongs in the main article, and is already there, so we need not consider a merge.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  09:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly POV fork. Section exists in the main article and should be kept there. No good reason to justify a separate article --Deepak D'Souza 11:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete dear God, look at the title. There's no way that article could ever be neutral. Sceptre (talk) 11:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.