Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegiance: War of Factions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  01:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Allegiance: War of Factions

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BEFORE revealed no online coverage, and even very few index links. In the WM library, appears only in games catalogues e.g. “Greater Games Industry Catalog • #6 Fall 2008: L.” Greater Games Industry Catalog, no. 6, Oct. 2008, pp. 136–42. EBSCOhost, link. We don't have an article for the publisher, so no obvious WP:ATD. Suriname0 (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123   (remark)  17:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Games. Suriname0 (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Courtesy pings for article contributors: Suriname0 (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Preview in Scrye: and will see if anything else comes up. BOZ (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Nice find! Suriname0 (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment There is also a review in Paizo's Undefeated magazine #9. I don't think I have that issue, but am checking. Guinness323 (talk) 19:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * keep I can't imagine the Undefeated review won't count toward WP:N, so it sounds like we are over the GNG bar of multiple reliable independent sources. Hobit (talk) 13:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.