Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Allen, California

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Moving on to Amador County, California, we have yet another isolated house in the middle of a national forest, the ruin of which is still visible on GMaps. It's one small building, not a community. Mangoe (talk) 19:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - "Allen" or "Allen Camp" was located on the Carson Trail (see ). This document published by Amador County states "Many families that grazed cattle and sheep left their names associated with places such as Allen Camp". The Allen Camp hiking trail is well documented. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete So a family grazed cattle there, no evidence there was ever a community there, less a notable one. Reywas92Talk 20:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't say there was a community there, nor did I vote keep. I simply added content relevant to this discussion.  No need to be loutish. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't say you said that. This is a separate vote, not a response to your comment which was indeed relevant, thanks for the sources. Just saying cattle grazing may be representative of a number of these non-community ranches. Reywas92Talk 23:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete "Unincorporated community" label is OR. Sources confirm that this was just a cattle/sheep grazing area, no evidence of significant coverage to meet GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 02:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another United States Geological Survey stub that should never have been created. --Cornellier (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.