Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Gina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:35, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Allen Gina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mid level official. Routine awards, promotional writing with a great over-emphasis on his importance. The sources are all of them unusable for notability, most of them just announcements.  DGG ( talk ) 02:06, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

I would like to contest the mid-level official statement. To be at the position of Assistant Commissioner, you must first be a part of the senior executive service. Also, his importance is to trade individuals and customs officials where he is often asked to speak. The language can be toned down, but he developed and implemented many trade programs that have benefited the U.S., such as the Centers of Excellence and the National Targeting Center (which should be a page too). For people who don't know, the centers of excellence are designated ports of entries where all imported goods of a certain type go. Prior to this, all imported merchandise were processed at whatever port of entry they were coming through. This allowed for specialization of import inspections (and purchasing the appropriate equipment). The National Targeting Center also helps find suspect imports and puts them on a watchlist for scanning prior to their arrival. -jbernardo1993 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:5430:2489:DCB6:3D20:1A57:7486 (talk) 11:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

delete on the basis of inadequate sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To article creator, User:Jbernardo1993 to keep this article on wikipedia, we need evidence that, beyond being a well-regarded public official and security consultant, Gina is demonstrably notable. This, according to standards imposed on all articles, can only be established by demonstrating that significant profiles and/or articles discussing his work in substantive ways have been published in reliable media outlets, (such as Wall Street Journal or Washington Monthly) Other standards can be found by following the links in the Articles for Deletion page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete not high enough for policy purposes to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Added source from the Journal of Commerce regarding his position at the office of international trade Jbernardo1993 (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I concur, none of this contains or amounts to substance. SwisterTwister   talk  21:43, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.