Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Ritter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Allen Ritter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Most of the sources cited in the article either mention his name only, or don't even mention him. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails WP:MUSBIO. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as my searches found nothing better and the article contains nothing else better convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There seem to be references and no one has mentioned specifically how it fails to meet WP:MUSBIO and each of the subcatergories within it. There needs to be evidence that the references fail to meet the notability requirements. --Have a great day :), Sanjev Rajaram (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources provided in the article do not provide any depth of coverage for Ritter. They are either mostly about someone else, or are merely credits lists. The one interview is brief, with a few quotes by Ritter but nothing else. Being a producer for notable singers does not confer notability on the producer. There's also nothing in the article that demonstrates he meets WP:MUSICBIO. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 06:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage. not notable. VanEman (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep He is a grammy nominated producer, and has produced for a ton of major artists today like Drake, Future, Travis Scott, etc. I don't know why but the guy who flagged this article flagged a bunch of other articles which had no problem with but abused it. Clearly this guy deserves to have his own page. Also, just to show how he abused it, look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Desiigner this guy flagged this artist that was in the Billboard 100, and some people were disgusted by it, its been saved now but thats not the point, this guy is trouble. --User:xboxmanwar (talk), 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I really didn't find anything that was depth in coverage. I think the articles needs major improvement period. Peacode  talk  04:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, unless they win a major award, or get in-depth coverage, music producers are run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Usually, being Grammy-nominated would be enough to pass, but with this guy, he was nominated with a lot of others on the same entry, making Ritter insignificant and WP:MILL.--Mr. Guye (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.