Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli L!ve


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Alli L!ve

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No evidence that this person actually exists. The supposed film credits in Sabrina and The Kid don't pan out in IMDB. No evidence of a character called "Lala Mozilla" existing in Sabrina. Tabercil (talk) 23:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 02:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No WP:RS to show that the subject meets WP:GNG, let alone WP:BLP or WP:MUSIC. Happy Editing! &mdash;  17:24, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There is definently no evidence that this person exists, and she also is using other celebrities photographs on her "facebook" page pretending they are her. I have found no credits with IMDB. HOAX —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.154.186.194 (talk) 00:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)  — 75.154.186.194 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep This is getting silly. How would it even be possible for someone to make up a career and then gain such a large following? Highly illogical. (SharkEmpress01 (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2010 (UTC))
 * If she has such a "large" following, then show us some evidence beyond a lone Facebook page, and a news item which looks suspiciously like it came from "Alli L!ve" herself... Tabercil (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Have you not seen her Twitter? 3,000+ people following a nobody would be highly suspicious. (SharkEmpress01 (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC))
 * Twitter is not a reliable source … have you even read the General notability guideline? Self-published sources don't mean a thing when it comes to establishing Notability by Wikipedia standards. &mdash; 70.21.16.94 (talk) 23:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  13:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete --Musamies (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.