Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli Royce Soble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Alli Royce Soble

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a photographer, which is based almost entirely on primary (her own website) and unreliable (Soundcloud clips, blogs) sources with very little evidence of the depth or breadth of reliable source coverage needed to clear WP:GNG. The only acceptable sources present here at all are the local LGBT community paper of the city where she works, and two of those three sources are just supporting that she won "Best Local Artist" in its annual reader survey -- which is not a notability claim that passes WP:NARTIST in and of itself -- and the third is a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself, which is a class of sourcing that would be acceptable for supplementary confirmation of stray facts after GNG had already been covered off by stronger sourcing, but cannot be the foundation of a GNG claim all by itself as the only reliable source in an article. The necessary quality of sourcing simply isn't here, and nothing claimed in the article is strong enough to earn her a presumption of notability in the absence of the necessary quality of sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per thorough analysis of nom. The sources provided do not indicate notability, and a WP:BEFORE search shows insufficientWP:DEPTH and WP:PERSISTENCE of coverage in independent, third party sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  09:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Local artist, failing WP:CREATIVE. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.