Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance for Women in Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Alliance for Women in Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of any real coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. Cjhard (talk) 09:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes GNG. I found plenty of reliable, 3rd party sources, added them to the article and removed the puffery. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on the current state of the article, as expanded by Megalibrarygirl, the organization appears to satisfy WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY, Megalibrarygirl has done it again. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.