Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance of Rouge Communities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. 2 Delete, 1 Weak keep and 1 Merge doesn't actually give any clear consensus. Suggested re-nomination after 2-3 months. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 08:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Alliance of Rouge Communities

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No online reliable sources found, PROD contested. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. It's also a copy/paste of their homepage (not a copyvio though) which doesn't help. Legoktm (talk) 11:21, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep - You must not have searched extensively because Google News archives provided several mentions, but unfortunately, nearly all of them require payment (particularly the links that seem useful). Google News also provided one minor mention here. Google News archives results briefly continue at the second page. I lean towards keep because it seems the state supported this initiative, the group focuses with improving the River Rouge (Michigan) and contains several communities as members. If these news links had been free, I would have volunteered to rewrite the article. SwisterTwister   talk  21:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 05:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to River Rouge (Michigan). Probably not independently notable: WP:ORG states that local press coverage isn't enough to establish notability, but that's all you get from Google News. I don't see any national sources. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.