Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie Gonino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Allie Gonino

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article lacks sources (save two, one of which is now defunct and the other a local newspaper) and is full of un-sourced, irrelevant information. Stunners (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article reads very much like a publicity blurb about the actress. I don't know that there's notability here, though the 8-episodes on 10 things may indicate something more. If this gets deleted, I would think the usual caveats would apply; she's early in her career, and might break out at some point. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Actress has appeared in a number of notable screen productions and is currently a series regular in a television series (The Lying Game) which was just picked for a full season, so WP:ENTERTAINER is clearly met. Article just needs to be cleaned up by removing all the fluff. I'm willing to clean it up myself.  Quasy Boy  04:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Cleaned up the article now.  Quasy Boy  20:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, per QuasyBoy. Tinton5 (talk) 21:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin This nomination does not appear to have been properly listed in the AfD log until now. Please consider the delay in listing when deciding if it is ready to be closed. Monty  845  18:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Kudos for the decent cleanup done by User:QuasyBoy. What was first nominated had "some" sourcing, but its style was horrific. QuasyBoy showed that a little work was all that was required. MUCH better now And now that his concerns have been addressed through regular editing, Perhaps the nom might consider a withdrawal.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.