Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Wireless


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lack of general notability and inclusion guidance at WP:CORP NJA (t/ c)  08:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Allied Wireless

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Article about a proposed future telecommunications company with no demonstration of notability — prod removed by author. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, but this article is. Nyttend (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16 December 2009  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/10/AR2009061002633.html This is a company which is paying $200 million for a package of assets that the sellers is required to divest. There is already enough evoidence to establish the company as notable. -- Eastmain (talk) 06:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 corporate article with no third party sources. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19 December 2009
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 17:34, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article claims the company is a subsidiary of Atlantic Tele-Network which has a similar article that already mentions this project.  If the larger company is on NASDAQ it may be notable and this article can be merged into that one. Sussexonian (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, working off of Eastmain's note. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 21:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Speedy Delete as this article makes no claim to notability in accordance with WP:CORP, nor does it cite any sources in support of such a claim. Wikipedia is not a barebones business directory, and there is no significant coverage for this company that would suggest an encyclopedic article can be written about it at this time. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 16:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, without encyclopedic value. $200,000,000 isn't very much money, and this is a shell corporation designed to accomplish a specific task. Abductive  (reasoning) 22:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.