Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allies of the Night


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The articles I was sent via email each contain a decent paragraph each, and are independent of the subject. Some may view this as not enough coverage, however, book reviews are often published in this type of concise format. North America1000 09:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Allies of the Night

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:BEFORE searches, including custom searches, this book appears to fail WP:BOOKCRIT. Not finding independent significant coverage/book reviews, etc. in source searches to qualify notability. Also finding no evidence that this book meets any other of the criteria at WP:BOOKCRIT. North America1000 04:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:14, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Here are two book reviews, which is enough to meet WP:NBOOK:






 * ProQuest has some more hits which I can look into if you'd like. Haukur (talk) 18:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi : I'm unable to access the sources myself. Do both reviews provide significant coverage? If so, I can withdraw this nomination. North America1000 19:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd say so but I've sent you an e-mail with the text of each so you can evaluate. I also threw in a third review, from The Sunday Business Post. All three reviews are short but they're clearly independent and critical reviews and not just blurbs or paid coverage. Haukur (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The author lists and gives the text of some reviews of the book on his webpage: This includes two of those mentioned above as well as some others that may be relevant - though some are probably self-published and not RS. Haukur (talk) 08:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.