Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison O'Neill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Allison O'Neill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems an unexceptional doctor. Likely fails WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'd say less by way of "likely fails" than "absolutely" fails. Unexceptional doctor, falls far below the NACADEMIC bar.   Ravenswing   09:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing showing how she is distinguished as a notable doctor. This generally is done through being a notable academic, and nothing shows that is met here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Too soon in her career to see what her impact will be. She appears to be an assistant professor (no one central page for these interlocking hospitals and Harvard and some are out of date), is doing research and publishing as first author. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - seems like an exceptional, albeit non-notable, doctor. We generally don't include attending physicians and non-tenured medical school instructors in our encyclopedia. WP:TOOSOON surely applies here. Bearian (talk) 01:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I don't think this is "far below" passing WP:NSCHOLAR, her top 5 articles have over 100 cites each. Unfortunately, all were written by multiple authors, so that isn't as strong as if she were the sole author. Clearly doesn't pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet criteria of WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't pass GNG and is possibly/probably TOO SOON in her career. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.