Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Raskin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ‑Scottywong | speak _ 17:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Allison Raskin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources with depth-of-coverage; most sources are primary, or are trivial mentions. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Being on New York Times Best Seller would make her notable per WP:AUTHOR Peter303x (talk) 21:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep – I agree with Peter303x. Barca (talk) 13:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep (the weakest possible keep, in fact) and significantly improve - As the author of a top ten New York Times bestseller reviewed by Kirkus, School Library Journal, Publisher's Weekly, Her Campus etc., she seems to meet the bare minimum standards of inherent notability under WP:AUTHOR (i.e. "won critical attention"). That said, this is only discernible through non-article sources. Appropriate sources affirming this (e.g., ), should be added. Also, I don't believe keeping this article precludes removal of all the unsourced or inappropriately sourced material, of which there is a lot. Realistically, this article shouldn't be more than a stub based on current source availability. Chetsford (talk) 06:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep a child of privilege who gets feature coverage Seattle Times, this week: Make your 20s a decade of friendship, say ‘Just Between Us’ hosts Gaby Dunn, Allison Raskin.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.