Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allopecia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to baldness. - Mailer Diablo 11:32, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Allopecia
Near-blatant dicdef. Not even sure it is even appropriate for Wiktionary... Wcquidditch | Talk 12:40, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Wcquidditch | Talk 12:40, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 12:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to baldness, like alopecia does. Pilatus 14:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * As per Pilatus, it's a mis-spelling of alopecia, which redirects to baldness and so should this. Although alopecia should really have its own article. Proto t c 15:49, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to baldness. - Sensor 00:18, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Baldness as a common misspelling of alopecia. -- DS1953 talk 01:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect but the Alopecia page is already complete and this page adds nothing to it. Also the 'balding in spots' Alopecia areata that the article mentions already has a full page. So this could just be deleted. Prashanthns 07:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Redirects are cheap, and prevent recreation as well as confusion. Xoloz 22:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.