Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alltynex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Alltynex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears non-notable, as a game and as a series. There is an interview with Nyu Media, but that is WP:PRIMARY and the other article about it is sponsored WP:PROMO content. Most sources are brief, non-significant mentions besides Hardcore Gaming 101. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  16:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Za  wl  08:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I see this one as to be notable, even with only a single English work to be had on the full topic, given its age and the fact its getting a western release after nearly two decades since original release. Since we don't have an article on the original developers, we might reasonably redirect to Kamui (video game) (where it is mentioned) or the re-publishing entity's page at Nyu Media. --Izno (talk) 04:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Based on the refs in Kamui (video game) that one doesn't seem notable either. They could potentially be combined into a Tale of Alltynex article... IF they were notable, which it doesn't seem they are. Ultimately it's probably best that both be deleted. Redirecting to Nyu Media would be a bit unnecessary, since they are merely "a" publisher of the game, not even its original publisher or developer. It seems like it would be a pointless redirect.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * They aren't notable with what we have in English media, is what I'm referring to. There might exist Japanese media with content, especially from the time period near the original release. --Izno (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Given that it's similarly unreferenced on the Japanese wiki, I doubt it. If someone wants to do a deep dive into Japanese sources and re-create the article that is fine, but there is no evidence currently that it's notable.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 18:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * delete No sources extant. NO RS. Fails GNGDlohcierekim (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.