Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ally Burguieres (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Ally_Burguieres
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable Bls119 (talk) 13:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 16.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and while I'm not sure why this was listed as "education" when it clearly is not, there's still nothing here at all for any conceivable notability at all. SwisterTwister   talk  22:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject shows no signs of notability as an artist or writer, or academic whatsoever. I also have additional concerns about dubious or absent sourcing: I'm having difficulties verifying that Queen's University grants PhDs in Media Arts and that one can take courses in Media Studies at Tulane University. The only source for her education, inthenola, calls her "a Ph.D. Professor of Media Arts". Well, no, She's an adjunct lecturer, according to the university's website. Purely promotional puffpiece. Mduvekot (talk) 21:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. More specifically from this link (not a reliable source, but suggestive) she was an adjunct lecturer in Tulane's school of continuing studies, not in any kind of art department. So academic notability is clearly not happening. The better question is whether she passes WP:ARTIST. The only thing we have that looks relevant for this is a design being selected by the super bowl (whatever that means) with only a youtube video as source. That's clearly not enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not finding enough to establish WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. Of the items in the press, most deal with a copyright dispute with Taylor Swift over her use of a fox that Burguieres says was her design.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is most likely WP:TOOSOON. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.