Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allyn Malventano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The publication may be notable, but the journalist does not seem to be according to the discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Allyn Malventano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be someone doing her job, but doesn't seem to meet the WP:JOURNALIST criteria. Twitter and her work page are insufficient sources, and the TWiT link doesn't actually mention her. A search did not find much of anything to meet WP:GNG. GABgab 15:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Does not meet WP:GNG. ubiquity (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) Technology journalist Allyn Malventano's Internet (Google) presence is centered on one online publication: PC Perspective.
 * 2) A search on "PC Perspective" shows that the publication, PC Perspective, has many (hundreds of) times more citations than Allyn Malventano (journalist), specifically.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Therefore, PC Perspective (publication) has more search prevalence than Allyn Malventano (journalist). It stands to reason that PC Perspective (presently not on Wikipedia), as a publication, should exist on Wikipedia before Allyn Malventano as primarily an author/contributor of the publication. Rblaettner (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a non notable journalist working for an non-notable outlet. Sources are insufficient to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.