Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allyn Rachel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SarahStierch (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Allyn Rachel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability Lady Lotus (talk) 22:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I've replaced 2 primary youtube cites with this WP:42 source . Both the NY Post and AdAge articles imply that the subject is well-known to much of the American TV-watching public even if her name might not be. Kilopi (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * But look at what she's known for - commercials. Since when is wikipedia a place to give commercial actors notability? Lady Lotus (talk) 18:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Stephanie Courtney? Tom Bodett? - Like Ms. Rachel, they've done a few other things too, but it's the commercials that make them notable. Kilopi (talk) 19:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yea but look at the amount of work that Stephanie Courtney has under her belt while Allyn Rachel has been in 2 shows, one as a bridal extra and 4 episodes of weeds? And Tom Bodett has 8 books? How can you even compare the two to Rachel? Lady Lotus (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep she is notable because she passes the general notability guidelines, with her coverage in the New York Post and elsewhere. When you have an article in a major newspaper titled "Girl interrupting Actress Allyn Rachel steals the show — during commercial breaks from your favorite series", and all about the actress, then that is significant coverage in a reliable source.  Had other things in her career as well besides commercials, but doesn't matter since she meets the WP:GNG already.   D r e a m Focus  17:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.