Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma (Lolo)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 00:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Alma (Lolo)
nn character in a video game Delete --JAranda &#124; watz sup 01:18, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this and the rest of the Lolo enemies. As much as I appreciate Sivak's contibutions to Eggerland articles, individual pages on these characters aren't needed. KingTT 02:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, recurring video game characters. No reason to take this information away from people. Kappa 09:51, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, they can't be merged into the main game article. Besides, we've got articles on recurring enemies from Super Mario (i.e. Goombas). While this game is less popular, the characters shouldn't be treated any different. If they cannot be expanded, you can make a list of enemies and minor characters from the game by copying the information to a new list and redirecting the original article. - Mgm|(talk) 14:38, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and wiki not an instruction manual. Marskell 14:42, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect the characters' pages into Eggerland series characters or something like that. They are useful but too insignificant to keep on separate pages. Andrew pmk | Talk 15:30, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Andrew and per existing policy. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:52, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Andrew pmk. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 23:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep recurring character from a long (12-game!) series by a major publisher. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:54, 24 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.