Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almir Badnjevic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Almir Badnjevic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ACADEMIC, and I do not see how he passes WP:GNG, none of the sources conform to our standards. Ymblanter (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   10:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   10:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   10:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete very few academics are notable academics in the first 5 years after getting their PhD and there is no indication that Badnjevic is an exception to this.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON. Google scholar shows that his works are being cited, but not yet at the volume required for WP:PROF. The primary sources used for his founding are neither sufficient for WP:GNG notability nor to support the exaggerated claims of the article ("the biggest scientific event in the last 20 years in Bosnia and Herzegovina"). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.