Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almon, Missouri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole Keep !vote does not seem to cite specific policy/guideline on why the article is notable, and is specifically rebuffed. As such, notability does not appear to be demonstrated Nosebagbear (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Almon, Missouri

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't think this place passes WP:GEOLAND. GNIS sources it to a rural schools map (Since school != actual community in the time this was active in rural America, it seems a little odd to source it to a school directory) and gives it a census code of U6, which means it is not an officially incorporated place, meaning it likely fails WP:GEOLAND. Does not appear on pre-GNIS small-scale topos. The State Historical Society calls it a post office. A search for coverage only brings up a bunch of WP:SPS family histories and mentions that someone "from" Almon died. Does not seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 19:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Revised article to include year of first settlement. Nominator is dead wrong to imply a community must be "incorporated" (Municipality) in order to be notable on Wikipedia. Unincorporated communities are an integral part of most all US county templates.72.49.7.25 (talk) 03:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Read WP:GEOLAND. Not every cluster of buildings is notable. Hog Farm Bacon 10:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 01:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 04:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No apparent evidence of significant coverage as an independent commuity that would qualify for WP:GNG or WP:GEOLAND. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.