Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaMax Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

AlphaMax Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable private school and my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant and notable to improve aside from one Books and various browser links. There's also no possible target for moving elsewhere because the only link is Education in Suriname. SwisterTwister  talk  19:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. It may be private but the school is clearly a reputable establishment delivering mainstream education at high school leve as documented at OUTCOMES. This somewhat older article started by a user who has not edited for over 4 years is not a stub but could use some help per WP:WPSCH/AG - easily enough done from information available in existing web sources. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  07:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Secondary school kept per longstanding precedent and consensus. Being private is irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.