Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaSphere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

AlphaSphere

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable object, promotional article from COI SPA editor. almost no references in respectable publications Rayman60 (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete This is even worse than sha. The Kurier article is an obvious advertorial. The pair of studies is fake; neither study has been formally published anywhere, much less undergone proper peer review. The links to the alleged radio programs are dead. Damvile (talk) 07:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia appears to be the best source for this material, as in there aren't any others.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Article looks puff piece. Accesscrawl (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT . Kpg  jhp  jm  02:55, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete agree that it fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in independent sources that are not WP:PRIMARY-- D Big X ray ᗙ  09:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Adamtt9 (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.