Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   02:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Alpha Island

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One of a hundred non-notable uninhabited remote Antarctic islands. Article has no references, and does not qualify under WP:GEOLAND or separately under WP:GNG. Has not received any non-trivial coverage in reliable independent sources. WP:EXISTence doesn't mean notability, WP:MAPOUTCOMES not withstanding. KDS4444 (talk) 07:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Has received non-trivial coverage in sources, the unsourced material may need to be removed for verifiability is an issue. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per source identified by User:Champion, and presumably other mentions of this small, cold island. Some other editor may boldly merge it into Palmer Archipelago if that were restructured to hold a bit more detail on the individual islands. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The mention of the island in the reference above is a WP:TRIVIAL one that does not include any in-depth coverage. But perhaps a merger into the Palmer Archipelago article would be more appropriate than deletion.  KDS4444 (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Keep♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.