Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Xi Omega


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Deleted by Deltabeignet under CSD A7 (non-notable group). Closed by SynergeticMaggot 18:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Alpha Xi Omega
Local-only fraternities and sororities are, in general, not notable. No expression of notability in this article, and it would be even less appropriate to turn this into a list of the multiple unreleated chapters of Alpha Xi Omega nationwide. —C.Fred (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I disagree with the nom on one part - if this were to be expanded to the point where it gave background of the organization (at a national level) and other goodness, it would be a decent article. But as it is, it's better off dead. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 03:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge Alpha Kappa Lambda was rechartered as Alpha Xi Omega in 1997. (from U.C. Berkeley page.) Somerset219 03:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It reads to me as though the Cal chapter of AKL was rechartered, not the fraternity as a whole. The fact that the Cal chapter is AKL's founding chapter may make that somewhat significant, but I doubt it.  Delete.  -- stubblyh ea d | T/c 15:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge —  per Somerset219 American Patriot 1776 05:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. User:Angr 05:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, yet another of your so-called "fraternities" or "sororities". J I P  | Talk 19:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No vote. I would like to see evidence that the various chapters around the nation are fundamentally unrelated and share no leadership or traditions. If this is the case, none of them are notable; otherwise, the current information in the article still has a place in a finished article on the nationwide fraternity. Deco 21:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The easiest evidence that they are unrelated is that one is a fraternity and the other found quickly is a sorority. That puts them in two separate branches of the tree, as it were. —C.Fred (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - per db-group, article makes no claim to notability. -- pm_shef 01:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's an important group. VanHalen 20:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local organisation only founded nine years ago. Not notable. -- Necrothesp 22:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.