Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alramz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per nominator and failure to also meet WP:GNG.

Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith on this decision. If you disagree and wish to discuss this further, please take it to Deletion Review. Happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 04:31, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Alramz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable company. Fails WP:NCORP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

hello, please reconsider the article before deleting ,the subject is mentioned in reliable sources of high quality which I cited, and there are more sources Osamagharib (talk) 23:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like an WP:ADVERT. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, delete the article :) This is not an advertisement, and I think that Wikipedia is not the right place to advertise. There are dozens of social media platforms that meet the needs of companies to advertise. Osamagharib (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Week delete the only thing a quick Google search yielded was the company's Bloomberg profile. Though there might be other, especially local, sources that may bring the article to GNG or NCORP standards. And right now the article, except for the lead, does indeed appear to be written like an advertisement. Colonestarrice (talk) 12:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.