Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alstom Citadis 305 (Sydney)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Alstom Citadis 305 (Sydney)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Content forking, is already or can be covered at CBD and South East Light Rail, Light rail in Sydney and Alstom Citadis. Not sufficiently different from any other versions of the Citadis to require a stand-alone article. Caen5120 (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom as a not-split-worthy content fork. per the main article on the type, the title is also erronious as the Citadis 305 is also used by three other systems. Nothing to merge as all pertinent detail is alread in the main article. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:04, 27 January 2021
 * Delete - per nom. There are also details of Australian versions of this tram here Alstom_Citadis. Teraplane (talk) 00:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not necessarily in protest of this if the community finds the article as unecessary but as an example, various rolling stock on Melbourne's tram network which are likewise in a common "family" of trams that already have an existing article, still have their own Melbourne specific articles up. ie. The C-class trams are Alstom Citadis 202's, the D-class trams are Siemens Combino's, the E-class trams are Bombardier Flexity Swift's. Not sure what the standards are. - Cement4802 (talk) 05:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.