Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt.talk.creationism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 02:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Alt.talk.creationism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Internet discussion group of the subject of creationism, have a look, decide for yourself, but IMO N/N per WP:WEB. Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I took part in discussion groups about this very topic that had 10 times the level of activity this one has, and I wouldn't consider those to be notable. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 01:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, no sources or attempt to assert notability. Earthdirt (talk) 01:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn - page looks like it would be used to push POV? Could have been speedy as ?  Sting_au    Talk  02:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry it doens't look as if it will be around much longer, unless we get a late rush of fundamentalist Christians intent on preserving the page as it is now ;)! -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 02:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's actually a very old, long-forgotten, page that has been mouldering for years until I recently had the 'bright' idea of checking through, and where necessary templating, creationism stubs. No need for any urgency. HrafnTalkStalk 04:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, doesn't assert notability in any way. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: even the article itself admits that it's just a (less notable) duplicate of talk.origins. No claim of notability, no 3rd party citations. HrafnTalkStalk 03:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to talk.origins; recognize it from my USENET days but can't see why it is truly WP:N. JJL (talk) 03:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing this group may have done had a Verifiable effect. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  07:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable website. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --John (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.