Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altacanyada, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to La Cañada Flintridge, California as all in all  this is questionable for its own article and so may be best merged to the listed article (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Altacanyada, California

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not an unicorporated area of LA county, it is merely a negihbourhood in La Canada. TJH2018  talk  00:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * delete This article only contains two sentences. 2602:306:3357:BA0:1C34:C732:DFBD:EFE2 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOEFFORT. North America1000 22:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to La Cañada Flintridge, California, in the absence of material to write a longer article. Neighborhoods of a larger city are plausible search terms. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Partially merge into La Cañada Flintridge, California without prejudice against recreation with suitable sourcing. I was unable to find enough sources to even get the article out of stub status at this time. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 17:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.