Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altasciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Altasciences

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a pharmaceutical company, not referenced to any reliable source coverage about it for the purposes of satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH: the references here are a business directory, a self-published press release, two primary source websites of non-notable industry awards that receive no media coverage, and one article which namechecks the existence of one of this company's subsidiaries a single time without actually being about it in any substantive way. Furthermore, the editor who originally created this keeps trying to revert-war it back to her preferred advertorialized version, strongly suggestive of a conflict of interest. There's simply not enough legitimate sourcing here to get it over WP:CORPDEPTH, and Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform. Bearcat (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as corporate spam on a nn company; does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Run-of-the-mill company with no apparent claims to notability. Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising or promotion and is not a yellow pages or directory, references fail the criteria for establishing notability and fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP  HighKing++ 13:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.