Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlternateHistory (website)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

AlternateHistory (website)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article makes no independently verified claim of notability. Per WP:BEFORE, the subject seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. Stuff like this and this are mere mentions; not nearly enough. This blog associated with NYT and this from heavy.com are also mere mentions; the articles aren't about the website. I also don't think this is an appropriate redirect to the article about alternate history. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Support: Mentions in books and blogs are not enough to make something notable. --★ Yexstorm2001 ★ ( talk ) 20:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. JesseRafe (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete--non-notable web content ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia  ᐐT₳LKᐬ  23:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.