Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate versions of Scarlet Witch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Scarlet Witch. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Alternate versions of Scarlet Witch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Topic fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. Rather than describe the topic summary style per WP:WAF, it was split out for no reason. TTN (talk) 18:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Scarlet Witch per WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 23:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge referenced content to Scarlet Witch per WP:ATD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge There is no reason to have this as a seperate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge as normal for these articles. Topic does not have the coverage to meet WP:NOTPLOT or WP:GNG. Should be covered in context of the character and the notable comics they appear in. Jontesta (talk) 15:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no "normal" for these articles, as some of them pass WP:LISTN and many of them do not. Ultimately, we treat them on a case-by-case basis.  Dark knight  2149  00:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Scarlet Witch (WP:ATD). BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.