Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative names for the United Kingdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete As per consensus. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Alternative names for the United Kingdom

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The content of this article substantially overlaps with Terminology of the British Isles and offers nothing significantly new. The article should be deleted as redundant to an already-existing, much better article. A redirect may be considered but I don't advise it. Chutznik (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom.  Redundant. 69.253.207.9 (talk) 19:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Already covered elsewhere, and there's nothing here that's really worth keeping.--Michig (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not needed. Wii Wiki (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to be redundant to material currently elsewhere. Guest9999 (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not required, possible redirect to Terminology of the British Isles but would tend to agree with nom. Paste Let’s have a chat. 21:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per all above. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  22:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect, I would say. It's a plausible search term.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  23:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The concept already exists on WP, and is redundant. Bearian (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Merge content that does already exist in Alt Names for UK Billbowery (talk) 02:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I can't imagine anyone searching under this terminology, but apparently it made sense to someone. --MelanieN (talk) 03:16, 24 August 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.