Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alterra Coffee Roasters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Consensus is borderline by the numbers. Tipping the balance somewhat for me is the fact that I was unable to locate any sources for the detailed information in the article - which is written in first person, further hinting at Original research and non-verifiability. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Alterra Coffee Roasters
advert for non notable company Nuttah68 08:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, ad, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat 09:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems notable enough. Feel free to remove adcopy. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-24 09:29Z 
 * Delete as advertisement, nn. "Someone else" can rewrite it.  Tychocat 09:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not rewrite utterly non-notable. does not deserve an article Bwithh 15:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete IMO the best coffee in Milwaukee, but, so what? nn, ad, fails WP:CORP --Oreb 20:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Possibly a minor mention somewhere in a coffee article wrt outlets that roast their own beans (I believe there are few worldwide, certainly far fewer than the average joe dispensary) if it is worth it, but not a page of its own. Jammo (SM247) 00:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and edit It's useful to have some corporate data and history for this, and people in that town will be able to consult it. Delete half of the text that sounds just like ad copy.
 * Comment Yeah, thanks, maybe "someone else" will do it in the rewrite.  My recommendations stands.  Tychocat 09:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The comment and both of the repeated "someone else" remarks in quotation marks sound memorably hostile.  I would edit it if I'd come across this in some usual Wikipedia search and not in a page of people fussing over texts as they stand.  Nice.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.