Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alton Parkway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Alton Parkway

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is unsourced and does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Per the US Streets wikiproject streets are generally not notable. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks like a pretty darn generic road on G maps, no assertion of nobility to reach WPStreets guidelines. Reywas92Talk 02:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete—fails to meet WP:GNG.  Imzadi 1979  →   13:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. If you search ocregister.com (the local newspaper) for "Alton Parkway" you can find quite a few hits, the first dozen or so of which are stories over a wide spread of years about an extension that was promised for years and opened on 2012. It's an important arterial for local traffic and planning purposes. But that doesn't make it notable for Wikipedia, and I don't know of any historical or landmark value that it serves; it's really just a road. One of many stubby, unsourced, and non-notable Wikipedia articles on roads in this area created repeatedly by the same user; see Articles for deletion/Red Hill Avenue for another. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, no notability hewhoamareismyself 06:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG as "just another road" with no substantive discussion of it in reliable sources. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 17:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Quick question though -- hypothetically, if this article gets deleted, and the original author creates it again, do we have to go through a 7-day 107.77.202.170 (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * After a full AfD returns a delete decision, if the article gets recreated again in substantially the same form, it can be speedily deleted without a discussion or waiting period via WP:CSD. And if it is repeatedly recreated and deleted, an administrator can protect it so that it can't be created again without changing the protection. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG pretty easily. SportingFlyer  T · C  13:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete concur with nom an other, a NN road. <b style="color:#00FF00">MB</b> 05:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.