Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altovis (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Altovis
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable herbal supplement/alternative medicine, fails WP:GNG. US-Verified (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with the delete. This is the only mention in scholarly journals I could find, mentioned briefly. Oaktree b (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Medicine.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don’t find anything to indicate notability. Mccapra (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing notable about this product in independent sources. It's just a run-of-the-mill herbal supplement with caffeine and ginseng. Nothing particularly groundbreaking or encyclopedic here. KoA (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.