Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altoz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Altoz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable manufacturer of equipment. PROD was declined, but no additional sources were supplied. I've looked and only found more of the same press release/equipment catalog style coverage. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah, this article has all the hallmarks of a promotional piece. said "I'm finding additional sources in a search and, combined with what is here, should be enough to establish notability" when they deprodded--well, without serious coverage this needs to be deleted. This looks like a PR piece, and so does this--it seems like Turf Magazine is just another industry mouthpiece, and this "local business leader" bit is no better. The rest of the sources aren't really worth discussing either. Delete. Drmies (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Update: I blocked the most recent editor per UPE: it is obvious what they were doing. Drmies (talk) 20:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The article creator probably was a COI/UPE, but they haven't made any edits since creating the article years ago, so probably not worth bothering with. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of significance.   scope_creep Talk  23:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks more like a product guide.  Kablammo (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)D
 * Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.