Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altrec.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as non-notable online retailer failing WP:CORP. —Doug Bell talk 18:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Altrec.com


Found tagged as speedy spam. The text is indeed spammy and badly needs cleanup if it's kept, but the article (and talk page) asserts notability in a not-entirely-adcopy-like way. Thought this merited more discussion. Opabinia regalis 03:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Multiple news references make this look at least mildly notable, though it needs a cleanup, especially of the linkspam at the bottom. —Cuivi é nen 04:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * conditional weak delete should be deleted if there are no references are in the article by the end of the afd discussion. i kan reed 05:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails most, if not all, points of WP:CORP - wtfunkymonkey 06:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete bloody spammy, needs massive cleanup and cites, if not, delete it.  SkierRMH, 07:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wtfunkymonkey. 1ne 00:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - spam, this reads like ad copy. WP:CORP applies I think. Pete Fenelon 00:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.