Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alusine Bangura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The single non routine source presented falls well short of establishing GNG. Fenix down (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Alusine Bangura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Initial concern was that the article failed WP:GNG. Contested opinion stated that the article was made before the TT Pro League was removed from WP:FPL (which it recently was) and thus should remain. I contend that the article does still fail WP:GNG and fails WP:NFOOTY, as the fact that this article was made before TT Pro League was removed from WP:FPL does not mean that it continues that presumption of notability. Jay eyem (talk) 21:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, He meets notability (besides meeting WP:NFOOTBALL criteria with pro league appearance) with this interview as well as the other sources listed. Also, if all articles that passed WP:NFOOTY had to pass WP:GNG, a lot of articles would be deleted; for example, the Russian Professional Football League players who all have a page. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 03:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok one, you don't need to ping me since I am watching the page, two I fail to see how this two paragraph piece is sufficient to meet WP:GNG, three he absolutely does not meet WP:NFOOTY, as there are no international appearances and no appearances in a fully-professional league, and four I would actually be perfectly fine with deleting a lot of those pages that don't meet WP:GNG but meet WP:NFOOTY, but this discussion isn't about them. Jay eyem (talk) 11:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * He would meet WP:NFOOTY as the article was created before the TT Pro League was removed. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The exact opposite is true, and this can be demonstrated by a recent precedent to demote certain American leagues from WP:FPL status. Regardless, the article still needs to pass WP:GNG, and more than a brief two-paragraph interview would be required here. Jay eyem (talk) 21:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article about semi-pro footballer who isn't the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources (the local coverage in Trinidad isn't quite in-depth enough, and much of it relates to his arrest and release; see, WP:BLP1E). Jogurney (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above – Levivich 04:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, Article does not meet requirements for WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 12:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.