Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvarado v. Gorton and the Union Pacific Railroad Co.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete Mandsford 21:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Alvarado v. Gorton and the Union Pacific Railroad Co.

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This article is clearly non-neutral, and primarily consists of unverifiable information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.58.249.58 (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Completing nomination for IP. It has been noted that the IP initiating this AFD is registered to Union Pacific, however I believe that there is indeed grounds for an AFD (as a neutral party).  Jujutacular  talk 20:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 20:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The lawsuit appears to have generated no secondary coverage, and therefore does not meet the WP:GNG.  --  j &#9883; e decker  talk  20:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a forum for presenting ones grievances against a company, and this case does not appear to satisfy Wikipedia's standard of notability at this point. Edison (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:N. Wikipedia has been overrun by plaintiffs' firms using it to advertise, but for some reason, this has not gotten the same attention as far more minor COI problems. THF (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As others posted above,WP:SPAM seems to cover it. Almost reads like a sheet from the plaintiffs notebook. Wolfstorm000 (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.