Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alverez (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Alverez
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Looks more like a resume' with no work being attached to anything notable. Hourick (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure about deletion. if any action at all, would say WP:MOVE or rename to "The MostCold" or "Alverez the MostCold". Thephmp (talk) 9:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I disagree, there is nothing notable about that article, while music may have been produced, nothing has even remotely hit a chart, and the people that ARE mentioned aren't notable. Even the other person that is mention in the article is someone that is equally un-notable. I don't put things up for deletion for the most part, but if there were two articles that need to be the subject of one, then those two are it. --Hourick (talk) 17:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 00:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I see no notability here. He has worked with a bunch of peaple, mostly non notable, but notability is not inherited. He has released some stuff but nothing that gained significant attention. The article has a ton of references (some which don't mention him or verify statements in the article) but I see none that I'd call non trivial coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.